Camilla Gennaro vs Brenda Fruhvirtova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Sep at 11:49 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Gennaro vs B. Fruhvirtova

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CZE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Gennaro 1 - 0 Fruhvirtova
They have played 3 sets in total, with Camilla Gennaro winning 2 and Brenda Fruhvirtova winning 1. The last match between Camilla Gennaro and Brenda Fruhvirtova was at the W15 Viserba, 13-09-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 6-4 4-6 7-6(4).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gennaro | 1 |
| Fruhvirtova | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) W15 Viserba(09-13-25)
C. Gennaro vs B. Fruhvirtova H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $544,180 |
| 51.31% (98-93) | Career Total W/L | 76.73% (122-37) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 15 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Gennaro vs B. Fruhvirtova Match Preview:
- Second serve performance: Recently, Gennaro wins 37.5% of points on their second serve, compared to Fruhvirtova's 20%. Is this indicative of better performance under pressure? Yes, it suggests Gennaro has the advantage.
- Return game analysis: Gennaro has won 54.2% and 34.94% of opponents' second and first serve points respectively, while Fruhvirtova has secured 47.06% and 31.82% in the same scenarios. This suggests Gennaro is more effective in return games recently.
- Saving breakpoints: Gennaro's ability to save 44.84% of breakpoints surpasses Fruhvirtova's 39.13%. Who defends better in crucial moments? The statistics favor Gennaro.
- Overall performance record: Fruhvirtova's win rate is 44.44% over the past year, whereas Gennaro's is slightly higher at 50.85%. Can we infer consistent performance from this? Yes, Gennaro seems more consistent.
- Surface preference: Historically, Fruhvirtova excels on clay with an 85% win rate, while Gennaro has a 53% win rate on the same surface. Do these stats suggest surface advantage? Yes, Fruhvirtova is likely more comfortable on clay.
- Opponent and event level: Over the last year, Gennaro has faced opponents with a higher average rank of 329.05 compared to Fruhvirtova's 383.67, indicating potentially tougher competition for Gennaro.
- Deciding set success: Fruhvirtova hasn't won any deciding sets recently, while Gennaro has a 53% success rate in deciding sets. Is this a clue for match tiebreak outcomes? Certainly, Gennaro appears more resilient.
- Breakpoint conversion: Fruhvirtova converts 41.67% of breakpoints, slightly better than Gennaro's 40.21%. Does this reflect high-pressure performance? It's a close call but favors Fruhvirtova slightly.
Editorial Prediction (September 13, 2025, UTC):
As we examine the statistical insights, it's evident that both players have distinct strengths and vulnerabilities. Gennaro's performance on second serves and in deciding sets presents a strong argument for their resilience and capability to capitalize under pressure.
Furthermore, Gennaro shows improved performance in return games and breakpoint saves, which could be crucial in shifting the momentum during critical match moments. This indicates an edge in defensive plays and converting opportunities into match-altering points.
While Fruhvirtova's exceptional win rate on clay surfaces highlights a classic advantage, it's essential to note Gennaro's consistency against higher-ranked opponents and better performance in event categories. The deciding factor might well be the competitive pressure where Gennaro typically performs better.
Considering all aspects, Gennaro's recent form, overall consistency, and competitive exposure suggest a likelihood of securing the victory in this upcoming match.
Camilla Gennaro vs Brenda Fruhvirtova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Gennaro vs B. Fruhvirtova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 16 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 2:37:33 | Average Match Time | 2:37:33 |
| 51% (50/99) | 1st Serve % | 57% (62/108) |
| 62% (31/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (37/62) |
| 47% (23/49) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (20/46) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Pts Won % | 55% (6/11) |
| 47% (51/108) | Return Points Win % | 45% (45/99) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Gennaro Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 7-6(3) | ||
Q3 | W | 6-1 6-7(5) 10-4 | ||
B. Fruhvirtova Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 2-6 6-2 4-0 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 3-6 6-4 10-6 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 6-4 4-6 7-6(4) | ||

C. Gennaro vs B. Fruhvirtova Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.31% (98/93) | YTD Win/Loss | 76.73% (122/37) |
| 50.69% (220/214) | Sets Win/Loss | 73.28% (255/93) |
| 51.84% (2071/1924) | Games Win/Loss | 60.48% (1827/1194) |
| 48.15% (13/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 65.71% (23/12) |
| 53.06% (78/69) | Clay Win/Loss | 83.33% (95/19) |
| 41.18% (7/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 103 | Aces Total | 199 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 450 | Total Double Faults | 438 |
| 1:26:35 | Average Match Time | 1:28:3 |
| 391.47 | Average Opponent Rank | 397.97 |
| 58% (5757/9963) | 1st Serve % | 67% (6323/9400) |
| 58% (3363/5757) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (4019/6323) |
| 44% (1863/4206) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1500/3077) |
| 48% (647/1341) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (729/1380) |
| 47% (4756/10125) | Return Points Win % | 51% (4755/9410) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 64.00% (16/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 44.44% (4/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 62.50% (5/3) |
| 45.45% (40/48) | Challenger W/L | 83.33% (95/19) |
| 56.31% (58/45) | Futures W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 51% (95/187) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 79% (121/153) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 40% (14/35) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 70% (16/23) |
| 51% (28/55) | Deciding Set Win % | 69% (22/32) |
| 83% (99/82) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 95% (115/109) |
| 16% (99/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 5% (115/6) |
| 16% (91/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 30% (44/13) |